Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,794
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 2:
Line 2: + +
→Monetary worth of Conservapedia: Money is a poor metric for measuring the value of greater understanding and faith, and happier lives.
Would you say it is possible to estimate the monetary worth of Conservapedia by taking the total editing time (or similar) and average wage of editors? This would make an interesting comparison with wikipedia, which has many unemployed/low earning editors. We could use this to calculate an average article worth as well. [[User:NigelP|NigelP]] 11:53, 1 March 2011 (EST)
Would you say it is possible to estimate the monetary worth of Conservapedia by taking the total editing time (or similar) and average wage of editors? This would make an interesting comparison with wikipedia, which has many unemployed/low earning editors. We could use this to calculate an average article worth as well. [[User:NigelP|NigelP]] 11:53, 1 March 2011 (EST)
:PS - if total log in time is unavailable, perhaps edit count could be used? [[User:NigelP|NigelP]] 11:55, 1 March 2011 (EST)
:PS - if total log in time is unavailable, perhaps edit count could be used? [[User:NigelP|NigelP]] 11:55, 1 March 2011 (EST)
::Conservapedia's value cannot be expressed in monetary terms. Money is a poor metric for measuring the value of greater understanding and [[faith]], and happier lives.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 12:01, 1 March 2011 (EST)