Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 116:
Line 116: − − ==I hope this is the right way to respond to you == − Ed, I was a Wiki-newbie when I got the boot, so I'm still fairly new to this whole process. I noticed your words of encouragement regarding Intelligent Design and I wanted to drop a quick reply. I hope I'm not vandalizing your page and I hope this is the proper way to reply to someone. I'm not an Intelligent Design expert. I am an editor and a nationally published writer. My comments at the Wikipedia ID page were primarily to point out logical/grammatical/fairness issues. I'm happy to help edit and I think the creation of this site is important for our children. If you need a minion to do some editing let me know. [[User:Everwill|Everwill]] 07:22, 31 March 2007 (EDT) − − :Many are the volunteers clamoring to become one of my teeming minions. ;-) − − ==Irc== − I be there.[[User:Rob Pommer| Cracker]]<sub>[[User_talk:Rob_Pommer|talk]]</sub> − − == Science Classroom == − I have a proposal to open a science classroom. The idea is to have '''experts''' in science (and I mean standard, practical science) answer basic science questions. It would not be a place for ideologues to leave their views or smear others. It would not be a place for non-mainstream science, e.g. creationism...as it is still not considered mainstream, it needs its own classroom. For example, someone could ask how scienice explains "x", and someone could give the ''standard'' answer. If anyone is interested in collaborating, especially ''wikigeeks'' who would have an idea how to set it up, let me know.--[[User:palmd001|PalMD]]<sup>[[User_talk:palmd001|talk]]</sup> 12:35, 31 March 2007 (EDT) − − − I trust you...--[[User:palmd001|PalMD]]<sup>[[User_talk:palmd001|talk]]</sup> 10:07, 2 April 2007 (EDT) − − == It's Not Fear == − Don't say you fear it but something like this: − Please include this information; or, − According to (blank) McCarthy did (this action) which had (that result). − We're not afraid of ideas here. It's not like some children's school library that censors Uncle Tom's Cabin or Huckleberry Finn because it might have a scary or offense passage. But like a library, there's a certain standard of decorum. --Ed Poor 16:02, 31 March 2007 (EDT) − − If fear is not a factor, it's certainly odd that I get so very few answers to simple and direct questions. It's also odd that so much of what I posted to the McCarthy article, all of which was cited and factual, was removed. --[[User:PF Fox|PF Fox]] 18:37, 31 March 2007 (EDT) − − :Without having looked at the edits... and without knowing your opinions of McCarthy... let me say that it ''is'' perfectly possible for things to be "cited and factual," yet tendentious. A good example would be [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Brown_University&oldid=66556 the initial version of the article on Brown University]. Take a look at it: it is completely factual and almost completely cited (and a citation for the "slavery" section is easily found). I say this because whenever someone says "everything I added was cited and factual," it always raised a bit of a red flag in ''my'' mind. Now let me go look at those edits... [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 13:50, 1 April 2007 (EDT) OK, I see your point. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 13:55, 1 April 2007 (EDT) − − It's nice to know that somebody here does. Too bad it won't change anything. --[[User:PF Fox|PF Fox]] 22:25, 1 April 2007 (EDT) − − ==Re: Tone and content of comments== − Thanks for the suggestion. I wasn't attacking him, I was genuinely amused by the fact that that was not immediately reverted, and especially with an edit summary like it was given. [[User:Linus M.|Liπus the Turbogeek]]<sup>([[User talk:Linus M.|contact me]])</sup> 10:28, 1 April 2007 (EDT) − − :Joy, fun and expressions of amusement are always welcome. See also the emerging [[Conservapedia:Civility]] discussion. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 15:34, 2 April 2007 (EDT) − − ==Uploading== − :I just resize image to less than 150kb, then try use random combination of letters as filenames, such as 56335.jpg or uuy587.jpg, usully works in less than 4 tries. Actully, this problem should be fixed on the server side, instead of requiring users to use stupid hacks. [[User:Jaques|Jaques]] 14:01, 2 April 2007 (EDT)
moving discussion to my user talk page
*Smear terms [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Joseph_McCarthy&diff=75010&oldid=74978]
*Smear terms [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Joseph_McCarthy&diff=75010&oldid=74978]