169
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 65:
Line 65: + + + +
→Intercourse: new section
Due to vandals it seems, there is no page on fornication, or [[sexual relations]] and the latter term page redirects here, but this issue is now basically covered from the Biblical definition here, and could serve to replace that missing page. By God's grace.[[User:Daniel1212|Daniel1212]] 17:56, 1 August 2009 (EDT)
Due to vandals it seems, there is no page on fornication, or [[sexual relations]] and the latter term page redirects here, but this issue is now basically covered from the Biblical definition here, and could serve to replace that missing page. By God's grace.[[User:Daniel1212|Daniel1212]] 17:56, 1 August 2009 (EDT)
== Intercourse ==
"Sexual intercourse" redirects here. Clearly this is not a page about sexual intercourse and none exists on Conservapedia. Even the news bar links here today in a blurb about sex (the act). What about creating a separate page for "Sexual intercourse" or "coitus" that explains in family- and Bible-friendly terms what it is? No use at all in pretending it doesn't exist, and this article is pretty clearly someone's bad idea to block the topic from Conservapedia. -[[User:IkeL|IkeL]] 14:04, 4 March 2011 (EST)