Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎Photo: new section
Line 544: Line 544:  
::globalsecurity.org is certainly not an objectionable source; the link provided gives no clue why (a) the Fiji coup should be included in the Reagan biographical article; (b) any U.S. government or Reagan administration foreign policy connection.  17:41, 15 January 2011 (EST)
 
::globalsecurity.org is certainly not an objectionable source; the link provided gives no clue why (a) the Fiji coup should be included in the Reagan biographical article; (b) any U.S. government or Reagan administration foreign policy connection.  17:41, 15 January 2011 (EST)
 
::And the ''Reagan-armed-bin Laden'' myth is debunked by the 9/11 Commission Report ([http://www.9-11commission.gov/report/911Report.pdf Chapt. 2]). As the Commission Report points out, bin Laden's rise to credibility to lead the jihad against the US & the West was ''precisely'' because he did not get in bed or take aid from the US in the Afghan war of resistance against the Soivet Union.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 18:15, 15 January 2011 (EST)
 
::And the ''Reagan-armed-bin Laden'' myth is debunked by the 9/11 Commission Report ([http://www.9-11commission.gov/report/911Report.pdf Chapt. 2]). As the Commission Report points out, bin Laden's rise to credibility to lead the jihad against the US & the West was ''precisely'' because he did not get in bed or take aid from the US in the Afghan war of resistance against the Soivet Union.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 18:15, 15 January 2011 (EST)
 +
 +
== Photo ==
 +
 +
It seems that official Presidential portraits/well known photos are used for all other Presidents...why is this one different? the picture seems to go against Conservapedia's claim of neutrality, as the photo cannot be taken in a way other than positive. [[User:SamuelGates|SamuelGates]] 00:47, 14 March 2011 (EDT)

Navigation menu