Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 29: Line 29:     
::::::: Sorry for the delay in responding.  Did you look at the links that I posted above?  I don't for a moment suggest that your own ignorance of evolutionary biology is deliberate.  But the editor who posted the whale reference should at least have taken a cursory look at the readily available material on the subject.  To reiterate: I am not saying that the evolutionary position is true.  I am saying that ''from an evolutionary point of view'' there is no lack of a plausible path any more than there is a lack of a plausible evolutionary path for any other creature.  Accordingly I suggest that the item be removed from the list.  --[[User:CecilQ|CecilQ]] 19:57, 8 March 2011 (EST)
 
::::::: Sorry for the delay in responding.  Did you look at the links that I posted above?  I don't for a moment suggest that your own ignorance of evolutionary biology is deliberate.  But the editor who posted the whale reference should at least have taken a cursory look at the readily available material on the subject.  To reiterate: I am not saying that the evolutionary position is true.  I am saying that ''from an evolutionary point of view'' there is no lack of a plausible path any more than there is a lack of a plausible evolutionary path for any other creature.  Accordingly I suggest that the item be removed from the list.  --[[User:CecilQ|CecilQ]] 19:57, 8 March 2011 (EST)
 +
 +
:::::::: I assume from the lack of response that no-one has any problem with me removing the item now.  --[[User:CecilQ|CecilQ]] 19:28, 16 March 2011 (EDT)
21

edits

Navigation menu