Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Talk:Counterexamples to Evolution (view source)

Revision as of 03:06, March 24, 2011

260 bytes added ,  03:06, March 24, 2011
→‎No other animal exhibits religion: There is no plausible evolutionary explanation for religion. If, as atheists think, religion is foolish, than animals less intelligent than humans should displ
Line 24: Line 24:  
::::The real problem with this point is that it is not, in any way whatsoever, a counterexample to evolution.  The fact that humans are the only animals with religion does not contradict any part of evolutionary theory.  --[[User:CecilQ|CecilQ]] 18:27, 21 March 2011 (EDT)
 
::::The real problem with this point is that it is not, in any way whatsoever, a counterexample to evolution.  The fact that humans are the only animals with religion does not contradict any part of evolutionary theory.  --[[User:CecilQ|CecilQ]] 18:27, 21 March 2011 (EDT)
 
:::::I assume that I should remove it if there is no objection?  --[[User:CecilQ|CecilQ]] 18:31, 23 March 2011 (EDT)
 
:::::I assume that I should remove it if there is no objection?  --[[User:CecilQ|CecilQ]] 18:31, 23 March 2011 (EDT)
 +
 +
:::::: There is no plausible evolutionary explanation for religion.  If, as atheists think, religion is foolish, than animals less intelligent than humans should display the reverence.  They don't.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 23:06, 23 March 2011 (EDT)
    
== Some of these are rather incomplete ==
 
== Some of these are rather incomplete ==
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,256

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/858728"

Navigation menu