Automoderated users, edit
140
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 52:
Line 52: +
Talk:Essay:Conservapedia's Law (view source)
Revision as of 03:26, March 24, 2011
, 03:26, March 24, 2011→Putting Conservapedia's Law in perspective
: I'd guess it's been a geometric growth in [[conservatism]] since [[Jesus]]. Before that, logic and the Old Testament would have helped, but evil was at work too. Right before the [[Great Flood]] it was pretty bleak; afterward, things were in good shape at least initially.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 22:47, 23 March 2011 (EDT)
: I'd guess it's been a geometric growth in [[conservatism]] since [[Jesus]]. Before that, logic and the Old Testament would have helped, but evil was at work too. Right before the [[Great Flood]] it was pretty bleak; afterward, things were in good shape at least initially.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 22:47, 23 March 2011 (EDT)
::Without a liberal corollary, Conservapedia's Law implies that conservatism has no limit. Do you think that is the case? I don't think we could possibly become "more conservative" than before the fall - it'd be like saying you could become more sinless than Adam was. I'm proposing that [[liberal creep]] acts as the limiting factor of conservatism. [[User:BradB|BradB]] 23:26, 23 March 2011 (EDT)