Automoderated users, edit
178
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 56:
Line 56: + +
Talk:Essay:Conservapedia's Law (view source)
Revision as of 03:55, March 24, 2011
, 03:55, March 24, 2011→Putting Conservapedia's Law in perspective
::::Geometric progressions never reach infinity, which is the mathematical analog of where Adam and Eve were before the Fall.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 23:43, 23 March 2011 (EDT)
::::Geometric progressions never reach infinity, which is the mathematical analog of where Adam and Eve were before the Fall.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 23:43, 23 March 2011 (EDT)
:::::I realize that, but isn't it possible that it could eventually reach an arbitrarily large number that would be extremely close to 100% conservatism? In my humble opinion, conservatism (as is the case with nearly everything) has some sort of limit. Whether it will be reached in our lifetimes (or 10 or 100 lifetimes from now) is unknowable. My point is, if there were some sort of hypothetical figure that represented total conservatism, that it could not be reached by Conservapedia's Law? Of course, I hope that eventually we do reach 100% conservatism, but I am curious as to your opinion, Mr. Schlafly. [[User:DennyW66|DennyW66]] 23:55, 23 March 2011 (EDT)