21
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 53:
Line 53: + +
Talk:Counterexamples to Evolution (view source)
Revision as of 21:33, March 27, 2011
, 21:33, March 27, 2011→No animal exhibits religion
::::::::I submit that evolutionists are trapped in their suppositions, and will never gain a correct understanding of animal life (let alone human life) until they are prepared to identify and reexamine these suppositions. If evolution is to be anything but a pseudoscience, it must compare its theory's hypotheses with reality and jettison those which the evidence contradicts. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 09:47, 25 March 2011 (EDT)
::::::::I submit that evolutionists are trapped in their suppositions, and will never gain a correct understanding of animal life (let alone human life) until they are prepared to identify and reexamine these suppositions. If evolution is to be anything but a pseudoscience, it must compare its theory's hypotheses with reality and jettison those which the evidence contradicts. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 09:47, 25 March 2011 (EDT)
:::::::::1. I did not make the argument that "animals might be as high as humans" (whatever that means). I was merely asking what it would look like if animals (squirrels in my example) were reverent. Would we even know? 2. I do not misunderstand religion. I am not proposing that religion is man made. I am pointing out the obvious counter argument to Aschlafly's position: Atheists would quite logically say that the reason that we do not see religion displayed in animals is because they have not developed advanced language sufficient to create religious doctrine and they have not invented building processes sufficient to build cathedrals, temples and mosques (nor, I suppose, have they yet invented the pipe organ in order that they might sing hymns on Sundays). 3. Your submission is fascinating but irrelevant to this discussion. Could we please focus on the issue at hand. In what way does the fact that man is the only creature to exhibit religion constitute a counterexample to evolution? Does anyone have a sensible answer? Or should I just remove the item? --[[User:CecilQ|CecilQ]] 17:33, 27 March 2011 (EDT)
== Some of these are rather incomplete ==
== Some of these are rather incomplete ==