Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
509 bytes added ,  15:36, March 28, 2011
added some more examples and made a separate section for them
Line 1: Line 1: −
The fallacy of the '''stolen concept''', also known as the fallacy of the '''self-negating statement''', is the [[logical fallacy]] of implicitly affirming what one wants to disprove or, alternatively, implicitly denying what one wants to prove.  That is, the [[conclusion]] [[contradiction|contradicts]] one of the [[premise]]s. An example is the [[postmodernism|postmodernist]] claim to know objectively that objective knowledge is impossible.
+
The fallacy of the '''stolen concept''', also known as the fallacy of the '''self-negating statement''', is the [[logical fallacy]] of implicitly affirming what one wants to disprove or, alternatively, implicitly denying what one wants to prove.  That is, the [[conclusion]] [[contradiction|contradicts]] one of the [[premise]]s.
 +
==Examples==
 +
*[[Socialist]]s claim that property is theft, but the concept of theft presupposes a right to own property.
 +
*[[postmodernism|Postmodernists]] claim to know objectively that objective knowledge is impossible.
 +
*[[Liberal Christianity|Liberal Christians]] claim that the [[Bible]], when [[Cafeteria Christianity|"rightly" divided]] and [[allegorical interpretation|"correctly" interpreted]], is the ultimate authority on [[faith]].  However, for that to work, the truly ultimate authority on faith would be the standard used for choosing which Bible verses to follow and for interpreting them, not the Bible itself.
 
==References==
 
==References==
 
*[http://www.goodart.org/stolen.htm Stolen Concept]
 
*[http://www.goodart.org/stolen.htm Stolen Concept]
 
[[Category:Logical Fallacies]]
 
[[Category:Logical Fallacies]]
Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
3,026

edits

Navigation menu