Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, Check users, delete, edit, oversight, protect, rollback
1,839
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: − Hmmm. One hears so much about the "mainstream" these days. It would seem to me that, if conservatism is ''really'' based on unchanging, immutable principles, then a true conservative should not give a d*** about whether he is in the mainstream or not, and should not invoke the mainstream (besides, since some liberal views, such as the call for universal health care, are now supported by a vast majority, couldn't they then just as readily lay claim to the "mainstream" as well?? [[User:Boethius|Boethius]] − − :And, not for nothing, but a source wouldn't be uncalled for somewhere in there. [[User:Myk|Myk]] 11:11, 28 March 2007 (EDT) − − ::Well there are a handful of sources now, but I can't write this thing by myself. [[User:Everwill|Everwill]] 15:02, 6 April 2007 (EDT) − Line 29:
Line 23: − − ==Liberal this, Liberal that== − − Oh just grow up Andy. Seriously, you're past the point of pathetic at this stage. (I'm referring to your recent editing of this article) − − Do you have a girlfriend, out of interest? [[User:Smith090|Smith090]] 19:28, 6 September 2007 (EDT)
Removing some liberal ranting
==Origins of the term==
==Origins of the term==
::The 'source' is a review of a book which appears written with the express intent of creating controversy, and with no context given even for its place in the book. Im going to take it out, and give the rest a general tidyup. - [[User:Suricou|Suricou]]
::The 'source' is a review of a book which appears written with the express intent of creating controversy, and with no context given even for its place in the book. Im going to take it out, and give the rest a general tidyup. - [[User:Suricou|Suricou]]
==Humorous early example==
==Humorous early example==