152
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 11:
Line 11: + + + + + + +
Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)
Revision as of 00:35, April 5, 2007
, 00:35, April 5, 2007...and about the math...
So no explanation of how opposing regulation of media (which is what opposition would require) is a liberal viewpoint, simply the statement that it is de facto the case without a lick of evidence to back it up. Marvelous. Your book deal with Regnery is a shoe in now sir. --[[User:RexMundane|RexMundane]] 20:32, 4 April 2007 (EDT)
So no explanation of how opposing regulation of media (which is what opposition would require) is a liberal viewpoint, simply the statement that it is de facto the case without a lick of evidence to back it up. Marvelous. Your book deal with Regnery is a shoe in now sir. --[[User:RexMundane|RexMundane]] 20:32, 4 April 2007 (EDT)
== ...and about the math... ==
You say that Wikipedia is 6 times more liberal than the American public, and one of the statistics you cite gives the American public as being 18% liberal.
So... Wikipedia is 108% liberal then? I mean that is what you're saying by treating the numbers that way. Of course thats just silly little me for thinking that cant be right. Here I am, brain the size of a planet and it looks for all the world to me like you're twisting math around your middle finger to make numbers say something they self evidently don't.
--[[User:RexMundane|RexMundane]] 20:35, 4 April 2007 (EDT)