Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 32:
Line 32: + + + +
much controversy within the field of CRT
Currently, the [[American Medical Association]]<ref>[http://www.narth.com/docs/correctionletter2.html]</ref>, [[American Psychiatric Association]]<ref>[http://archpsyc.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/extract/56/10/883]</ref>, and [[American Psychological Association]] uniformly discourage therapeutic or pharmacologic attempts at altering sexual orientation, going so far as to say that it can harm the individual. <ref>[http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2000-02/APA-tdiw-0302100.php]</ref><ref>[http://psycnet.apa.org/?fa=main.doiLanding&doi=10.1037/0735-7028.33.3.249]</ref>
Currently, the [[American Medical Association]]<ref>[http://www.narth.com/docs/correctionletter2.html]</ref>, [[American Psychiatric Association]]<ref>[http://archpsyc.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/extract/56/10/883]</ref>, and [[American Psychological Association]] uniformly discourage therapeutic or pharmacologic attempts at altering sexual orientation, going so far as to say that it can harm the individual. <ref>[http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2000-02/APA-tdiw-0302100.php]</ref><ref>[http://psycnet.apa.org/?fa=main.doiLanding&doi=10.1037/0735-7028.33.3.249]</ref>
==Quotes==
* There is much controversy within the field of CRT, and interested researchers and laypeople alike clearly declare themselves as proponents for or opponents against CRT. There does not appear to be any middle ground. Virtually every discussion of CRT centers around two issues: the effectiveness of CRT and the ethicality of CRT. (Philip Osteen)
==References==
==References==