5
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 4:
Line 4: + +
no edit summary
:The "citation needed" in the paragraph "Evidences of a greater complicity..." is unnecessary since an actual example is given in the next paragraph: "For instance, in 1922..." [[User:Rich P|Dr. Richard Paley]] 14:43, 15 March 2007 (EDT)
:The "citation needed" in the paragraph "Evidences of a greater complicity..." is unnecessary since an actual example is given in the next paragraph: "For instance, in 1922..." [[User:Rich P|Dr. Richard Paley]] 14:43, 15 March 2007 (EDT)
A citation is definately needed for this line "The Piltdown Man was publicized as the "Missing Link" between man and ape-like species, which eluded (and still eludes) promoters of evolution." because there are fossils that link homo sapiens and the great apes, just like there are transitional fossils between homo habilis and neaderthals. As well, "Like similar artifacts purporting to prove evolution today, there was no independent or public scrutiny of the actual materials" this is quite the bold statement to make since many scientists examine the same fossils for their research ie "lucy", this absolutely needs a citation (credible one) if it is to have any merit. -shoe