Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 463:
Line 463: + +
Conservapedia talk:How Conservapedia Differs from Wikipedia (view source)
Revision as of 21:11, April 15, 2011
, 21:11, April 15, 2011→#15 – »blog monitoring«: They call CP a blog, and ...
I'm quite curious to read about this too, does anyone know the source? [[User:RaymondP|RaymondP]] 21:26, 15 May 2010 (EDT)
I'm quite curious to read about this too, does anyone know the source? [[User:RaymondP|RaymondP]] 21:26, 15 May 2010 (EDT)
:About half the time I try to correct something biased with neutral prose, they'll turn around and say, "You're not at Conservapedia." --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 17:11, 15 April 2011 (EDT)
== Official names ==
== Official names ==
I'm guessing that Conservapedia is a stickler for official names to be used as article names and references rather than any slang or alternetive names. Best example I can think of is that Conservapedia rightly uses the correct name [[Londonderry]] for the city in [[Northern Ireland]] unlike Wikipedia who caved into Irish liberals and now use the incorrect slang term "derry". Shouldn't this be included in the commandments as using correct names for things rather than alternetives. [[User:King1|King1]] 16:14, 14 June 2010 (EDT)
I'm guessing that Conservapedia is a stickler for official names to be used as article names and references rather than any slang or alternetive names. Best example I can think of is that Conservapedia rightly uses the correct name [[Londonderry]] for the city in [[Northern Ireland]] unlike Wikipedia who caved into Irish liberals and now use the incorrect slang term "derry". Shouldn't this be included in the commandments as using correct names for things rather than alternetives. [[User:King1|King1]] 16:14, 14 June 2010 (EDT)