768
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 20:
Line 20: + + Line 39:
Line 41: + +
Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)
Revision as of 01:46, April 5, 2007
, 01:46, April 5, 2007→Porn again
::: Do I think a lack of citations are the issue here? No, I don't. I don't think people sincerely doubt the correlation.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 21:44, 4 April 2007 (EDT)
::: Do I think a lack of citations are the issue here? No, I don't. I don't think people sincerely doubt the correlation.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 21:44, 4 April 2007 (EDT)
::::I almost positive that Andy is correct on this. I'm also almost positive that correlations aren't reliable because there might be a tertiary variable unaccounted for... say... freedom of speech? [[User:Myk|Myk]] 21:46, 4 April 2007 (EDT)
== ...and about the math... ==
== ...and about the math... ==
::: Perhaps the biggest lesson I've learned so far from this project is that liberals won't admit any liberal bias. It's remarkable, really. Mtur, if you don't think Wikipedia has liberal bias, do you think any group does? The NEA? The Democratic Party? Rock musicians? A board meeting at the Village Voice?--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 21:44, 4 April 2007 (EDT)
::: Perhaps the biggest lesson I've learned so far from this project is that liberals won't admit any liberal bias. It's remarkable, really. Mtur, if you don't think Wikipedia has liberal bias, do you think any group does? The NEA? The Democratic Party? Rock musicians? A board meeting at the Village Voice?--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 21:44, 4 April 2007 (EDT)
::::Mtur did not question the presence of liberal bias... Mtur is smart and knows there's no way your would budge on that. He's saying your math is misleading. [[User:Myk|Myk]] 21:46, 4 April 2007 (EDT)