11
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 2:
Line 2: + + + + + + +
Talk:Ontological argument (view source)
Revision as of 20:43, April 24, 2011
, 20:43, April 24, 2011no edit summary
The argument assumes that something has to meet the definition of god. otherwise the conclusion would not follow. --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim <small>(CPAdmin1)</small>]]<sup>[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]</sup> 12:37, 21 August 2007 (EDT)
The argument assumes that something has to meet the definition of god. otherwise the conclusion would not follow. --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim <small>(CPAdmin1)</small>]]<sup>[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]</sup> 12:37, 21 August 2007 (EDT)
==Ontological Proof For the Flying Spaghetti Monster==
The Flying Spaghetti Monster is that for which no greater being is conceivable.
That which exists is greater than that which does not exist.
That which does not exist fails to satisfy the definition of the Flying Spaghetti Monster.
Therefore the Flying Spaghetti monster exists.
[[User:Kamiwashinda|Kamiwashinda]] 16:43, 24 April 2011 (EDT)