2
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 115:
Line 115: + + +
no edit summary
:I may have saved you from getting blocked, actually. When an edit is reverted by an administrator ([User:DouglasA]), it is typically common procedure to either (a.) wait for the reverting admin to address your concerns on the article's talk page, or (b.) step away from it for a bit until the necessary parties (i.e. senior admins) have had a chance to address your concerns. -- [[User:JLauttamus|Jeff W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:JLauttamus|<sub>Discussion</sub>]] 19:53, 8 June 2010 (EDT)
:I may have saved you from getting blocked, actually. When an edit is reverted by an administrator ([User:DouglasA]), it is typically common procedure to either (a.) wait for the reverting admin to address your concerns on the article's talk page, or (b.) step away from it for a bit until the necessary parties (i.e. senior admins) have had a chance to address your concerns. -- [[User:JLauttamus|Jeff W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:JLauttamus|<sub>Discussion</sub>]] 19:53, 8 June 2010 (EDT)
:I'll address your concerns regarding the facts on the article's talk page momentarily. -- [[User:JLauttamus|Jeff W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:JLauttamus|<sub>Discussion</sub>]] 19:53, 8 June 2010 (EDT)
:I'll address your concerns regarding the facts on the article's talk page momentarily. -- [[User:JLauttamus|Jeff W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:JLauttamus|<sub>Discussion</sub>]] 19:53, 8 June 2010 (EDT)
==Victor Dahdaleh==
Hi and thanks for your message. I am the author of the original Wikipedia article and have altered and updated the entry slightly before adding it to Conservapedia. I removed the dead internal links. [[User:Richardhughes|Richardhughes]] 11:33, 27 April 2011 (EDT)