Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:  
'''1. Pick a question that you missed on the midterm exam, and describe several different ways that you could have figured out the correct answer instead.'''  
 
'''1. Pick a question that you missed on the midterm exam, and describe several different ways that you could have figured out the correct answer instead.'''  
   −
The most important thing I should have done was double check my answers.  As well stick with my first impression. If I had done this failing question six could have been easily prevented. My first impression was that the compromise of 1877 ended the reconstruction (the correct answer). Unfortunately I began to give it to much thought to the word compromise which lead me to switch my answer to D (that the Compromise of 1877-Elected the first Democrat president after the civil war.) Altogether if I had spent more time studying I would not have been unsure of my first answer.
+
The most important thing I should have done was double check my answers.  As well stick with my first impression. Failing question six could have been easily prevented if i had done this. My first impression was that the compromise of 1877 ended the reconstruction (the correct answer). Unfortunately I began to give it to much thought to the word compromise which lead me to switch my answer to D (that the Compromise of 1877-Elected the first Democrat president after the civil war.) Altogether if I had spent more time studying I would not have been unsure of my first answer.
    
'''3. Please explain your views of the Scopes Trial.'''  
 
'''3. Please explain your views of the Scopes Trial.'''  
Line 43: Line 43:  
'''H5. Do you think the ideas of Darwinism -- survival of the fittest -- made World War I so horrific?'''
 
'''H5. Do you think the ideas of Darwinism -- survival of the fittest -- made World War I so horrific?'''
   −
Absolutely, Social Darwinism explains such conflict as natural. It was the justification countries used to justify their quest for greater power and authority.  
+
Absolutely, Social Darwinism explains such conflict as natural. It was the justification countries used to justify their quest for greater power and authority. The idea that there is no ultimate authority and everything was created through chaos is insane.  
    
Kyle M.
 
Kyle M.

Navigation menu