Changes

== Wrong bias. ==

== Wrong bias. ==

The second problem is that the Conservapedia claim reads currently "Wikipedia is six times more liberal than the American public". So, this sentence talks about liberals, and the public, and that is what you need to compare: Liberals and public. It doesn't mention conservatives in any form, except that they are part of the public.

The second problem is that the Conservapedia claim reads currently "Wikipedia is six times more liberal than the American public". So, this sentence talks about "liberals", and "the public", and that is what you need to compare: "Liberals" and " the public". It doesn't mention conservatives in any form, except that they are part of "the public".

We know that [[User:Aschlalfy]] doesn't want to count moderates. In his world view moderates don't count, even if they are the majority. He doesn't care that according to his math 997 moderates, 1 conservative and 2 liberals, are as biased as 666 liberal, 333 conservatives and one moderate. Most of us would disagree. If Wikipedia's articles would be for 99.7 percent unbiased (moderate), we wouldn't have this discussion, nor would Conservapedia have a reason to exist. [[User:Order]] April 5, 14:25 (AEST)

We know that [[User:Aschlalfy]] doesn't want to count moderates. In his world view moderates don't count, even if they are the majority. He doesn't care that according to his math 997 moderates, 1 conservative and 2 liberals are as biased as 666 liberals, 333 conservatives and one moderate. Most of us would disagree. If Wikipedia's articles would be for 99.7 percent unbiased (moderate), we wouldn't have this discussion, nor would Conservapedia have a reason to exist. [[User:Order]] April 5, 14:25 (AEST)