Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 298: Line 298:     
No, really...I have never been anything but respectful.  The fact that I disagree with you doesnt mean I dont respect you.  [[User:Palmd001|Palmd001]] 23:10, 24 March 2007 (EDT)
 
No, really...I have never been anything but respectful.  The fact that I disagree with you doesnt mean I dont respect you.  [[User:Palmd001|Palmd001]] 23:10, 24 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
:I am not esposing or promoting any belief.  I am merely asserting that an any article on any topic should describe it before going into couterarguments.  Criticism is important, especially in science.  But without representing the theory of evolution accurately, it is not a valid encyclopedia article.  This is an encyclopedia, right?  As it stands, this article does not even discuss the theory at all, so we can't even begin to approach accuracy.  Surely you wouldn't disagree that an article on a given topic must actually describe the topic, right?
    
== Vote ==
 
== Vote ==
71

edits

Navigation menu