Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
547 bytes removed ,  06:40, April 5, 2007
→‎The Historical Jesus: deleted book review. also, case of pontius pilate was not about existence, it was about his title. also, what does this have to do with Jesus?
Line 13: Line 13:  
==The Historical Jesus==
 
==The Historical Jesus==
 
[[Image:Santa.jpg|right|thumb|The image depicts a hypothetical construction of what someone from Jesus' time and location might have looked like.]]
 
[[Image:Santa.jpg|right|thumb|The image depicts a hypothetical construction of what someone from Jesus' time and location might have looked like.]]
Occasionally someone denies the existence of Jesus, but few scholars take this seriously.  Tacitus, the Roman historian, wrote about Jesus in A.D. 115<ref>http://www.digisys.net/users/ddalton/evidence_of_jesus_outside_the_bible.htm</ref>, and Josephus, a Jewish historian who did not believe in Jesus' divinity, wrote about Him. <ref>http://www.christian-thinktank.com/jesusref.html</ref>.
+
Occasionally someone denies the existence of Jesus, but few scholars take this seriously.  Tacitus, the Roman historian, wrote about Jesus in A.D. 115<ref>http://www.digisys.net/users/ddalton/evidence_of_jesus_outside_the_bible.htm</ref>, and Josephus, a Jewish historian who did not believe in Jesus' divinity, wrote about him. <ref>http://www.christian-thinktank.com/jesusref.html</ref>.
 
  −
Many of the descriptions in the Gospels have been proven true with modern archeology.  Skeptics challenged the existence of Pontius Pilate, for example, about whom there is almost no historical evidence outside of the Gospels.  But in 1961, the only known inscription of Pontius Pilate was discovered, confirming his existence.<ref> http://www.bible-history.com/empires/pilate.html</ref>
  −
 
  −
[[Lee Strobel]]'s book ''The Case for Christ'' contains a number of interviews with experts on the historical Jesus, and is a good resource on this subject.
      
==References==
 
==References==

Navigation menu