Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
3,026
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
New article. Feel free to add more.
'''Homosexual logic''' is the "logic" used to justify the [[Homosexual Agenda]]. Like [[liberal logic]] generally, homosexual logic relies on statements that appear to be logical but that are actually rife with [[logical fallacy|logical fallacies]]. Examples include:
#Calling things the opposite of what they are, e.g., justifying their [[special rights]] as just another form of [[Equal Protection Clause|equal protection]].
#Improperly shifting the [[burden of proof]] by asserting that homosexuality must be understood as not a choice until it is [[Logical_fallacy#Argument_from_silence|conclusively shown]] to be one.
#[[Slippery slope]] arguments in which they argue that repression of homosexuality will lead to a series of bad results that actually will not follow or that have nothing to do with homosexuality.
#[[Cafeteria Christianity|Cherry-picking]] only those parts of the [[Bible]] that suit their purposes, while arguing that any parts of Scripture that are inconvenient to them [[Liberal Christianity|need to be "interpreted" correctly]] or were "[[Mosaic Law|nailed to the Cross]]," or that just by mentioning them, you are "twisting" them in some unspecified way.
[[Category:Homosexual Agenda]]
#Calling things the opposite of what they are, e.g., justifying their [[special rights]] as just another form of [[Equal Protection Clause|equal protection]].
#Improperly shifting the [[burden of proof]] by asserting that homosexuality must be understood as not a choice until it is [[Logical_fallacy#Argument_from_silence|conclusively shown]] to be one.
#[[Slippery slope]] arguments in which they argue that repression of homosexuality will lead to a series of bad results that actually will not follow or that have nothing to do with homosexuality.
#[[Cafeteria Christianity|Cherry-picking]] only those parts of the [[Bible]] that suit their purposes, while arguing that any parts of Scripture that are inconvenient to them [[Liberal Christianity|need to be "interpreted" correctly]] or were "[[Mosaic Law|nailed to the Cross]]," or that just by mentioning them, you are "twisting" them in some unspecified way.
[[Category:Homosexual Agenda]]