143
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 414:
Line 414: +
Debate:Is Conservapedia fair and balanced? (view source)
Revision as of 01:02, May 6, 2011
, 01:02, May 6, 2011→No, But...
:::::By the way, I do find it telling that you implied I made a fallacious argument somewhere, but failed to support that contention. Given you are advocating that others act in a more noble manner, your lack of holding yourself up to a high standard is very poor form. As a result, I see no compelling reason to further posts to this web page. But please feel free to engage in any [[last wordism]] that you may wish to engage in. [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 19:42, 5 May 2011 (EDT)
:::::By the way, I do find it telling that you implied I made a fallacious argument somewhere, but failed to support that contention. Given you are advocating that others act in a more noble manner, your lack of holding yourself up to a high standard is very poor form. As a result, I see no compelling reason to further posts to this web page. But please feel free to engage in any [[last wordism]] that you may wish to engage in. [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 19:42, 5 May 2011 (EDT)
::::::I think conservative's first comment is the most apropos illustration of silliness of this site. KingHanksley: "I have some serious objections to how information is presented on this site". Conservative: "Atheists are fat". Touché , conservative - argument over. [[User:EricAlstrom|EricAlstrom]] 19:59, 5 May 2011 (EDT)
::::::I think conservative's first comment is the most apropos illustration of silliness of this site. KingHanksley: "I have some serious objections to how information is presented on this site". Conservative: "Atheists are fat". Touché , conservative - argument over. [[User:EricAlstrom|EricAlstrom]] 19:59, 5 May 2011 (EDT)
:::::::You complain over lack of substance but you fail to provide any. So, where did Conservative make a fallacious argument? One of the main points of Consevapedia is to hold liberals to account, and Conservative's articles do this in a fun and informative manner. Wikipedia already exists, why try to turn Conservapedia into a copy of it? [[User:JimmyRa|JimmyRa]] 21:02, 5 May 2011 (EDT)