Changes

::::::::::I have to disagree.  I think Conservapedia is already a great site.  Before signing up as an editor I observed the site for a few months and came to respect the culture that has developed here.  Sometimes people come in here so used to the watered down criticism of liberals they see in the mainstream media that they're unable to see the substance behind Conservapedia's critique.  I like the site as it is, and would hate to see it change.  If anything I'd like to see us step up our critique of liberalism.  You complain that our commentary on atheism and Obama aren't nuanced enough.  Again I have to disagree, some moral issues are black and white not shades of gray, as moral relativists would have us believe.  So to present these issues in any other way would be dishonest.  You also have to remember that the content Conservative authors is very popular and brings in a lot of page views. [[User:JimmyRa|JimmyRa]] 21:33, 9 May 2011 (EDT)

::::::::::I have to disagree.  I think Conservapedia is already a great site.  Before signing up as an editor I observed the site for a few months and came to respect the culture that has developed here.  Sometimes people come in here so used to the watered down criticism of liberals they see in the mainstream media that they're unable to see the substance behind Conservapedia's critique.  I like the site as it is, and would hate to see it change.  If anything I'd like to see us step up our critique of liberalism.  You complain that our commentary on atheism and Obama aren't nuanced enough.  Again I have to disagree, some moral issues are black and white not shades of gray, as moral relativists would have us believe.  So to present these issues in any other way would be dishonest.  You also have to remember that the content Conservative authors is very popular and brings in a lot of page views. [[User:JimmyRa|JimmyRa]] 21:33, 9 May 2011 (EDT)

:::King, re: atheism and obesity: A few atheists? I suggest you return to grammar school and relearn how to count. It appears as though you want to play the fallacy of exclusion game and leave it all the relevant data I provided concerning the very religious plus deal with all the data I gave concerning atheists. You are not fooling anyone. [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 22:43, 9 May 2011 (EDT)

:::King, re: atheism and obesity: A few atheists? I suggest you return to grammar school and relearn how to count. It appears as though you want to play the fallacy of exclusion game and leave it all the relevant data I provided concerning the very religious plus deal with all the data I gave concerning atheists. You are not fooling anyone. [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 22:43, 9 May 2011 (EDT)

:::King, please cite one factual error or one false claim I made in the article. You can't! :)

:::King, please cite one factual error or one false claim I made in the article. You can't! :) I have decided to end the discussion on this page as it appears as if it will be unproductive. [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 23:07, 9 May 2011 (EDT)