278
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 3:
Line 3: + + +
Conservapedia talk:Locks and Blocks (view source)
Revision as of 11:58, April 5, 2007
, 11:58, April 5, 2007→Conservapedia:Locks and Blocks Discussion: example
''we do not block for ideological reasons'' ... ''but for silliness'' what happens when someone decides that someone else's ideology is silliness?
''we do not block for ideological reasons'' ... ''but for silliness'' what happens when someone decides that someone else's ideology is silliness?
[[User:WhatIsG0ing0n|WhatIsG0ing0n]] 07:09, 5 April 2007 (EDT)
[[User:WhatIsG0ing0n|WhatIsG0ing0n]] 07:09, 5 April 2007 (EDT)
:Wouldn't "''...it comes right at the end of the Bible where you can't miss it''" in the article [[Fornication]] [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Fornication&oldid=86794] be considered ''[[silliness]]'' or is that ''[[ideology]]''?
:[[User:WhatIsG0ing0n|WhatIsG0ing0n]] 07:58, 5 April 2007 (EDT)