SkipCaptcha, nsSupply_SidersR, nsSupply_Siders_
8,436
edits
Changes
re: when is a debate over?
::::of course, i mistook you for karajou. I apologize for the mistake. [[User:Gresavage|Gresavage]] 20:16, 12 May 2011 (EDT)
::::of course, i mistook you for karajou. I apologize for the mistake. [[User:Gresavage|Gresavage]] 20:16, 12 May 2011 (EDT)
:::::i would like to know, however, when would you consider a conversation to be complete? For instance, one could just keep arguing and arguing with absolutely no validity, and never concede to the veracity of the others points; how do you suppose we determine when the conversation is over then. I used this as an example because it seems to be the case on many of the talk pages, especially those concerning more concrete matters. Users will provide detailed and thorough rebuttals, sometimes with properly cited sources, and yet the administrators disallow editing of the main page.
:::::i would like to know, however, when would you consider a conversation to be complete? For instance, one could just keep arguing and arguing with absolutely no validity, and never concede to the veracity of the others points; how do you suppose we determine when the conversation is over then. I used this as an example because it seems to be the case on many of the talk pages, especially those concerning more concrete matters. Users will provide detailed and thorough rebuttals, sometimes with properly cited sources, and yet the administrators disallow editing of the main page.
::::::This being a meritocracy, if you're debating an administrator the argument is either over when you've convinced him or her OR when you've made all your points and haven't convinced the individual. If multiple admins are involved or if no admins are involved, it's really based on consensus.--<small>[[User:Iduan|<span style="color: #FFCCCC; background: #660000">I]][[User_talk:Iduan|<span style="color:#CCCCFF; background:#000033">Duan]]</span></span></small> 21:02, 12 May 2011 (EDT)