Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,790
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 306:
Line 306: − +
Talk:Counterexamples to Evolution (view source)
Revision as of 22:50, May 13, 2011
, 22:50, May 13, 2011correct misspelling
It's not a question of being persuasive, what I indicated above and the vast majority of the article are factually and demonstrably incorrect. This is not a subjective issue. The points in the article are poor logic, factually incorrect, or demonstrate a lack of understanding of what the theory of evolution actually says. As such, the article needs to be amended or removed. --[[User:HarabecW|HarabecW]] 18:10, 13 May 2011 (EDT)
It's not a question of being persuasive, what I indicated above and the vast majority of the article are factually and demonstrably incorrect. This is not a subjective issue. The points in the article are poor logic, factually incorrect, or demonstrate a lack of understanding of what the theory of evolution actually says. As such, the article needs to be amended or removed. --[[User:HarabecW|HarabecW]] 18:10, 13 May 2011 (EDT)
: Please take our quiz on [[Essay:Quantitying Openmindedness|openmindedness]]. If the counterexamples were so "demonstrably incorrect," as you claim, then you could easily do so.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 18:50, 13 May 2011 (EDT)
: Please take our quiz on [[Essay:Quantifying Openmindedness|openmindedness]]. If the counterexamples were so "demonstrably incorrect," as you claim, then you could easily do so.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 18:50, 13 May 2011 (EDT)