Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
10 bytes added ,  02:08, May 16, 2011
no edit summary
Line 1: Line 1: −
In relation to '''atheism and debate''', although atheists claim there are reasonable arguments for [[atheism]], the quality of atheist debate has been quite poor from the proponents of atheism.  For example, [[Richard Dawkins]] has [[Instances of Richard Dawkins ducking debates|established a reputation of avoiding his strongest debate opponents]]. On May 14, 2011, the [[Great Britain|British]] newspaper ''The Telegraph'' published a news story entitled ''Richard Dawkins accused of cowardice for refusing to debate existence of God''.<ref>http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/religion/8511931/Richard-Dawkins-accused-of-cowardice-for-refusing-to-debate-existence-of-God.html</ref> Below are some examples which demonstrate the unreasonableness of atheist debaters.   
+
In relation to '''atheism and debate''', although atheists claim there are reasonable arguments for [[atheism]], the quality of atheist debate has been quite poor from the proponents of atheism.  For example, [[Richard Dawkins]] has [[Instances of Richard Dawkins ducking debates|established a reputation of avoiding his strongest debate opponents]]. On May 14, 2011, the [[Great Britain|British]] newspaper ''[[The Daily Telegraph]]'' published a news story entitled ''Richard Dawkins accused of cowardice for refusing to debate existence of God''.<ref>http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/religion/8511931/Richard-Dawkins-accused-of-cowardice-for-refusing-to-debate-existence-of-God.html</ref> Below are some examples which demonstrate the unreasonableness of atheist debaters.   
 
===Doug Jesseph===
 
===Doug Jesseph===
  
Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,969

edits

Navigation menu