Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
3,026
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 2:
Line 2: + +
example
The middle-ground fallacy is the opposite of the [[False Dilemma]], the fallacy of assuming without justification that the middle ground does not exist at all. Both arguments are fallacies because the mere existence of two extreme positions says nothing about the existence or the rightness of the middle ground.
The middle-ground fallacy is the opposite of the [[False Dilemma]], the fallacy of assuming without justification that the middle ground does not exist at all. Both arguments are fallacies because the mere existence of two extreme positions says nothing about the existence or the rightness of the middle ground.
As an example, the middle ground between [[Christianity]] and [[evolutionism]] is not necessarily correct. In fact, it is disastrously wrong.<ref>[http://www.albertmohler.com/2011/02/01/creation-vs-evolution-the-new-shape-of-the-debate/ Creation vs. Evolution — The New Shape of the Debate]</ref>
==References==
==References==
<references/>
<references/>
[[Category:Logical Fallacies]]
[[Category:Logical Fallacies]]