4,994
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 69:
Line 69: + + + + − − I'd rather not see this sentence or anything similar to it even in the article, but I felt this was the best version to convey the particular sentiment. <font color="FFD700">[[User:ColinR|ColinR]]</font><sup><font color="000000">[[User_talk:ColinR|talk]]</font></sup> 09:47, 5 April 2007 (EDT)
→Who says so?
Something like this can certainly go in the article, but not as a weaseled "some argue" that does not give any traceable link to ''who'' makes this argument and ''what'' their argument would be. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 09:42, 5 April 2007 (EDT)
Something like this can certainly go in the article, but not as a weaseled "some argue" that does not give any traceable link to ''who'' makes this argument and ''what'' their argument would be. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 09:42, 5 April 2007 (EDT)
I'd rather not see this sentence or anything similar to it even in the article, but I felt this was the best version to convey the particular sentiment. <font color="FFD700">[[User:ColinR|ColinR]]</font><sup><font color="000000">[[User_talk:ColinR|talk]]</font></sup> 09:47, 5 April 2007 (EDT)
*Oh, I'd '''rather''' not see it in the article myself, but that's a different issue... [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 09:49, 5 April 2007 (EDT)
<references/>
<references/>