Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,790
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 21:
Line 21: + +
→Sorry: reply
::::That isnt what a website like this is deigned for. It is supposed to be editable by everyone and everyone can contribute. If this is a website meant for a select group, then why allow us plebs to do any editing at all? If they want to outsource the sucker work like fixing grammar, they need to say so. The article is atrociously bad and needs to be removed. I gave ample time for people to read and respond. --[[User:HarabecW|HarabecW]] 14:09, 22 May 2011 (EDT)
::::That isnt what a website like this is deigned for. It is supposed to be editable by everyone and everyone can contribute. If this is a website meant for a select group, then why allow us plebs to do any editing at all? If they want to outsource the sucker work like fixing grammar, they need to say so. The article is atrociously bad and needs to be removed. I gave ample time for people to read and respond. --[[User:HarabecW|HarabecW]] 14:09, 22 May 2011 (EDT)
:::::I don't know. TK say you can do whatever you want with a wikipedia software website. These guys are doing what they want with this one. [[User:NKeaton|Nate]] 14:12, 22 May 2011 (EDT)
:::::I don't know. TK say you can do whatever you want with a wikipedia software website. These guys are doing what they want with this one. [[User:NKeaton|Nate]] 14:12, 22 May 2011 (EDT)
::::::Harabec, I think you simply deleted a substantial amount of material in an entry. Is that what you call "editing"?--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 14:19, 22 May 2011 (EDT)