Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 127: Line 127:     
::: JDW wrote, "The most obvious definition of the term [natural born citizen] in the American context is having citizenship conferred to you at birth in the USA."  Right, no problem there.  But implicit in that concept -- and made explicit by the [[14th Amendment]] -- is that the family submit to the jurisdiction of the United States as its national sovereign.  That's what is lacking in births to diplomats, visitors, Native Americans circa 1800, students on visas, etc.  There is nothing "very narrow indeed" about those exceptions.  The Native American population was large, for example.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 20:21, 23 May 2011 (EDT)
 
::: JDW wrote, "The most obvious definition of the term [natural born citizen] in the American context is having citizenship conferred to you at birth in the USA."  Right, no problem there.  But implicit in that concept -- and made explicit by the [[14th Amendment]] -- is that the family submit to the jurisdiction of the United States as its national sovereign.  That's what is lacking in births to diplomats, visitors, Native Americans circa 1800, students on visas, etc.  There is nothing "very narrow indeed" about those exceptions.  The Native American population was large, for example.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 20:21, 23 May 2011 (EDT)
 +
:::::In what ways do students on visas not submit to the US as national sovereign? Are filing tax returns, being subject to the law of the land, obliged to fill out the census and other obligations not an aspect of their being subject to US sovereignty for the duration of their stay in the US? [[User:LloydR|LloydR]] 21:38, 23 May 2011 (EDT)
    
== ".... giving him a greater claim to being a natural-born citizen than Obama has." ==
 
== ".... giving him a greater claim to being a natural-born citizen than Obama has." ==
110

edits

Navigation menu