110
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 133:
Line 133: +
Talk:United States presidential election, 2012 (view source)
Revision as of 02:53, May 24, 2011
, 02:53, May 24, 2011→Avoiding liberal double standard apropos Rubio: Name some, and what would their actions have to do with the question at hand?
: The [[14th Amendment]] defines citizenship: "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, '''and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States''' and of the State wherein they reside." (emphasis added). Many people have been born here who do not accept being subject to the full jurisdiction of the United States.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 22:45, 23 May 2011 (EDT)
: The [[14th Amendment]] defines citizenship: "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, '''and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States''' and of the State wherein they reside." (emphasis added). Many people have been born here who do not accept being subject to the full jurisdiction of the United States.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 22:45, 23 May 2011 (EDT)
::Really? Who? And more to the point, does the refusal of some people to recognize US sovereignty has anything to do with any particular individual's eligibility? Is there any evidence that Anne Dunham's baby boy did not "accept being subject to the full jurisdiction of the United States?" [[User:LloydR|LloydR]] 22:53, 23 May 2011 (EDT)
== ".... giving him a greater claim to being a natural-born citizen than Obama has." ==
== ".... giving him a greater claim to being a natural-born citizen than Obama has." ==