Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
103 bytes removed ,  05:44, May 24, 2011
m
Reverted edits by HarabecW (talk) to last revision by DanieleGiusto
Line 7: Line 7:     
::::Your observations provide more insight than the article does, so perhaps we should put something to this effect in the article.  You're absolutely right, the original "modest proposal" does require that the game be sold, although free downloads are readily available.  In sum, Jack Thompson could use some good conservative defenders, and the only portion of this article that provides that viewpoint is the word "effective." If he's effective, then what effect has he had (other than being disbarred, poor fellow)? [[User:DanieleGiusto]] 23:42, 6 January 2010 (EST)
 
::::Your observations provide more insight than the article does, so perhaps we should put something to this effect in the article.  You're absolutely right, the original "modest proposal" does require that the game be sold, although free downloads are readily available.  In sum, Jack Thompson could use some good conservative defenders, and the only portion of this article that provides that viewpoint is the word "effective." If he's effective, then what effect has he had (other than being disbarred, poor fellow)? [[User:DanieleGiusto]] 23:42, 6 January 2010 (EST)
−
  −
Added details about A Modest Videogame Proposal --[[User:HarabecW|HarabecW]] 01:24, 24 May 2011 (EDT)
 
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,890

edits

Navigation menu