| Line 69: |
Line 69: |
| | !Comments | | !Comments |
| | |- | | |- |
| − | |Tennessee, where an overwhelming majority of legislators claim to be pro-life. | + | |Tennessee |
| − | |Passed nothing, and then gave pro-aborts a gift by approving putting abortion on the ballot (SJR 127), where the abortion industry can pull down pro-life candidates as the abortion industry spends money to defeat it
| + | |Despite big majorities claiming to be pro-life, they passed no abortion law and instead gave pro-aborts a gift by approving putting abortion on the ballot (SJR 127), where the abortion industry can defeat pro-life candidates and the referendum by spending money on its defeat |
| | |There's been a lack of socially conservative legislation for years there | | |There's been a lack of socially conservative legislation for years there |
| | |- | | |- |
| − | |Arizona, where big majorities won on pro-life platforms. | + | |Arizona |
| − | |Only passed three worthless laws: HB 2416, HB 2384, and HB 2443.<ref>http://newmexicoindependent.com/69773/arizona-ends-legislative-session-with-several-laws-limiting-abortion-access-funding</ref>
| + | |Despite big majorities claiming to be pro-life, Arizona passed only three worthless laws: HB 2416, HB 2384, and HB 2443.<ref>http://newmexicoindependent.com/69773/arizona-ends-legislative-session-with-several-laws-limiting-abortion-access-funding</ref> |
| | |The [[RINO]] Speaker of the House Adams -- now running for [[Congress]] -- refused to allow a vote on meaningful [[pro-life]] legislation, despite passing by big majorities in committees. | | |The [[RINO]] Speaker of the House Adams -- now running for [[Congress]] -- refused to allow a vote on meaningful [[pro-life]] legislation, despite passing by big majorities in committees. |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 80: |
Line 80: |
| | |Nothing, despite passing good laws in prior sessions. | | |Nothing, despite passing good laws in prior sessions. |
| | |A [[RINO]] was Speaker of the House. | | |A [[RINO]] was Speaker of the House. |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |Pennsylvania
| |
| − | |Nothing, despite a massive scandal of alleged murders committed by an abortionist.
| |
| | | | | | |
| | |- | | |- |
| − | |Oklahoma, which claimed to have elected the most pro-life legislature (and a pro-life governor) in the nation. | + | |Oklahoma |
| − | |
| + | |Nothing, despite claiming to have the most pro-life legislature (and a pro-life governor) in the nation. |
| | | | | | |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 93: |
Line 90: |
| | | | | | |
| | |- | | |- |
| − | |Georgia, where the governor and many legislators won by claiming to be pro-life | + | |Georgia |
| − | |Not a single pro-life bill passed.
| + | |Not a single pro-life bill passed, despite the governor and many legislators winning elections by claiming to be pro-life |
| | | | | | |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 104: |
Line 101: |
| | |Though supposedly a conservative state, it failed even to pass an ultrasound bill, with a Republican legislator casting the deciding vote against it in the Senate.<ref>http://trib.com/news/state-and-regional/govt-and-politics/article_555def8b-7111-5063-9463-f4029552bf96.html</ref> | | |Though supposedly a conservative state, it failed even to pass an ultrasound bill, with a Republican legislator casting the deciding vote against it in the Senate.<ref>http://trib.com/news/state-and-regional/govt-and-politics/article_555def8b-7111-5063-9463-f4029552bf96.html</ref> |
| | | | | | |
| − | |- | + | | |
| | |- | | |- |
| | |California | | |California |