Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 17: Line 17:     
:::::The Bible scientific?  Where was I when this was decided?  Also you can't use it as a historical information source as well as it has many conflictions within itself.  For instance the see the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genealogy_of_Jesus#Variations_between_the_genealogies Genealogy of Jesus].  Definately not historically accurate. --[[User:Trekie9001|trekie9001]] 16:53, 28 March 2007 (EDT)
 
:::::The Bible scientific?  Where was I when this was decided?  Also you can't use it as a historical information source as well as it has many conflictions within itself.  For instance the see the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genealogy_of_Jesus#Variations_between_the_genealogies Genealogy of Jesus].  Definately not historically accurate. --[[User:Trekie9001|trekie9001]] 16:53, 28 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
::::::I'm not going to use as a source of Biblical information anything from Wikipedia.  As for the Bible being a reliable source of info both historical and scientific, that was decided long before you were born.  And we are going to use it here.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 14:26, 5 April 2007 (EDT)
    
==Plagiarism/Copying from Wikipedia==
 
==Plagiarism/Copying from Wikipedia==
Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, Moderators, move, protect, rollback, Administrators
27,336

edits

Navigation menu