3
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 288:
Line 288: + +
Debate:Can conservapedia become the next Wikipedia, is this good or bad (view source)
Revision as of 20:30, May 30, 2011
, 20:30, May 30, 2011no edit summary
: Free speech means allowing the competition of ideas, such that over time good wins out. As you imply, a rule of "NPOV" is a non-starter from the get-go. Often "NPOV" can just be a ruse to enforce an undisclosed ideology.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 20:47, 26 March 2011 (EDT)
: Free speech means allowing the competition of ideas, such that over time good wins out. As you imply, a rule of "NPOV" is a non-starter from the get-go. Often "NPOV" can just be a ruse to enforce an undisclosed ideology.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 20:47, 26 March 2011 (EDT)
The concept of Conservapedia and it's tagline as "The Trustworthy Encyclopedia" is somewhat incorrect. The collation of articles with a specific bias (in this case, those falling to th (far) right of the Political spectrum) does not an accurate encyclopedia make. The whole objective of an encyclopedia is to present unbiased as possible information on everything pertaining to a subject (such as a Medical or Economics Encyclopedia) or that of a book-Encyclopedia, like you'd find in your nearest library.