767
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 176:
Line 176: + +
Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)
Revision as of 19:28, April 5, 2007
, 19:28, April 5, 2007→More bias
::Upon inspection, I realized that the [[Oriental]] article was copied wholesale from wikipedia and then adjusted. [[User:Myk|Myk]] 15:22, 5 April 2007 (EDT)
::Upon inspection, I realized that the [[Oriental]] article was copied wholesale from wikipedia and then adjusted. [[User:Myk|Myk]] 15:22, 5 April 2007 (EDT)
Wrong again, sire. I wrote crafted the Oriental article on which the current abomination is based. I copied a version of the article I wrote and then editted further before porting it here. The bottom line is, it makes no difference how '''I''' define these words. The real truth is that people will say or think whatever they want regardless of whatever is written herein or therein. This argument is not about the meaning of those terms ''per se''. I'm point to those articles as yet one more example of liberal bias which quietly pervades every corner of Wikipedia. There's nothing the matter with that. Just don't try to pretend like this is NPOV, because it's not. It's a liberal view of the world. [[User:Everwill|Everwill]] 15:28, 5 April 2007 (EDT)