Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
295,150
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 2:
Line 2: + +
Savage
:It is not appropriate to discuss any of the important details of this disgusting man or the Santorum business on this website. [[User:NKeaton|Nate]] 12:42, 6 June 2011 (EDT)
:It is not appropriate to discuss any of the important details of this disgusting man or the Santorum business on this website. [[User:NKeaton|Nate]] 12:42, 6 June 2011 (EDT)
::Well, you've been here longer than I, but I would prefer the opinion of an administrator. Savage is a prominent figure on the left, and he has had a definite impact on politics. My intention with this article was to make it vague where anything lewd would be.--[[User:CamilleT|CamilleT]] 13:55, 6 June 2011 (EDT)
::Well, you've been here longer than I, but I would prefer the opinion of an administrator. Savage is a prominent figure on the left, and he has had a definite impact on politics. My intention with this article was to make it vague where anything lewd would be.--[[User:CamilleT|CamilleT]] 13:55, 6 June 2011 (EDT)
:::The external link might not be appropriate, but a biographical scetch on the man, his agenda and methods is very much of interest. Is there another link available that gives us a fair picture of the substance of his blog?
:::P.S., is this the same Dan Savage cited here, [http://cp.noym.net/6c5a00fedfca7c0f I won't ban anybody just now... Tue, 15 May 2007 22:19:38 -0700]? From RW 1.0, ''"I suppose it is too much to ask Dan Savage (or Jon Stewart?) to help us googlebomb the term? ..."'' [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 15:27, 7 June 2011 (EDT)