Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
295,150
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 5:
Line 5: + + +
RW 1.0
:::P.S., is this the same Dan Savage cited here, [http://cp.noym.net/6c5a00fedfca7c0f I won't ban anybody just now... Tue, 15 May 2007 22:19:38 -0700]? From RW 1.0, ''"I suppose it is too much to ask Dan Savage (or Jon Stewart?) to help us googlebomb the term? ..."'' [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 15:27, 7 June 2011 (EDT)
:::P.S., is this the same Dan Savage cited here, [http://cp.noym.net/6c5a00fedfca7c0f I won't ban anybody just now... Tue, 15 May 2007 22:19:38 -0700]? From RW 1.0, ''"I suppose it is too much to ask Dan Savage (or Jon Stewart?) to help us googlebomb the term? ..."'' [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 15:27, 7 June 2011 (EDT)
::::I was not involved in the group or discussion you linked to.--[[User:CamilleT|CamilleT]] 16:52, 7 June 2011 (EDT)
::::I was not involved in the group or discussion you linked to.--[[User:CamilleT|CamilleT]] 16:52, 7 June 2011 (EDT)
:::::It appears Savage is an old hand at Google bombing; he was once considered a contact to help make the names NAMBLA & Conservapedia interchangeable the same way he did Santorum and fecel material. Is there a way to work this cite into the narrative? [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 17:01, 7 June 2011 (EDT)
== spellcheck ==
== spellcheck ==
Edit summaries are not subject to firefox's spell check. [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:CamilleT/Dan_Savage&curid=112941&diff=876654&oldid=876653 lol]--[[User:CamilleT|CamilleT]] 16:51, 7 June 2011 (EDT)
Edit summaries are not subject to firefox's spell check. [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:CamilleT/Dan_Savage&curid=112941&diff=876654&oldid=876653 lol]--[[User:CamilleT|CamilleT]] 16:51, 7 June 2011 (EDT)