Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
292,409
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 44:
Line 44: +
→Reversion
:See my comment above. I'm happy to answer any further questions. [[User:Cristiana55|Cristiana55]] 22:44, 7 June 2011 (EDT)
:See my comment above. I'm happy to answer any further questions. [[User:Cristiana55|Cristiana55]] 22:44, 7 June 2011 (EDT)
::Oh, I didn't quite understand that when viewing from the edit page. The CSM and USM&WR are reliable sources and I didn't intentionally delete them. However, I see nothing in the brief paragraph on Revere that draws from them. Please note that the CSM maintains, "She remains kind of wrong," and USN&WR offers an odd opinion at variance with a quote it highlights smack in the middle of the page: ". . .where he had stopped to warn Samuel Adams and John Hancock of the impending attack. . ." The other reference is a blog I myself do not consider a reliable source. You may feel differently and wish to restore it. What confounds me is the effort demonstrated here to adjust the facts to fit Palin's story, which is obviously not spot-on. [[User:Cristiana55|Cristiana55]] 22:58, 7 June 2011 (EDT)
::Oh, I didn't quite understand that when viewing from the edit page. The CSM and USM&WR are reliable sources and I didn't intentionally delete them. However, I see nothing in the brief paragraph on Revere that draws from them. Please note that the CSM maintains, "She remains kind of wrong," and USN&WR offers an odd opinion at variance with a quote it highlights smack in the middle of the page: ". . .where he had stopped to warn Samuel Adams and John Hancock of the impending attack. . ." The other reference is a blog I myself do not consider a reliable source. You may feel differently and wish to restore it. What confounds me is the effort demonstrated here to adjust the facts to fit Palin's story, which is obviously not spot-on. [[User:Cristiana55|Cristiana55]] 22:58, 7 June 2011 (EDT)
:::See my above comment on a non-contemporaneous phrase. "Big government" can be used without mentioning Palin's name in the mainspace. I don't see where this would be a problem, at all. It nails the historical issues quite effecively, irrespective of whatever an ideological persepective anyone is coming from, then, now, or in the future. [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 23:05, 7 June 2011 (EDT)