| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | <center>'''''Reminder: Please sign all comments. Thank you'''''</center> | + | <div style="text-align:center">'''''Reminder: Please sign all comments. Thank you'''''</div> |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| | | | |
| | Actually, Revere was captured early on. Other riders sent out the warning, but Revere had a name that was easy to rhyme. [[User:Czolgolz|Czolgolz]] 14:21, 17 April 2007 (EDT) | | Actually, Revere was captured early on. Other riders sent out the warning, but Revere had a name that was easy to rhyme. [[User:Czolgolz|Czolgolz]] 14:21, 17 April 2007 (EDT) |
| Line 18: |
Line 16: |
| | "On Tuesday evening, the 18th, it was observed, that a number of Soldiers were marching towards the bottom of the Common. About 10 o'Clock, Dr. Warren Sent in great haste for me, and beged that I would imediately Set off for Lexington, where Messrs. Hancock & Adams were, and acquaint them of the Movement, and that it was thought they were the objets." | | "On Tuesday evening, the 18th, it was observed, that a number of Soldiers were marching towards the bottom of the Common. About 10 o'Clock, Dr. Warren Sent in great haste for me, and beged that I would imediately Set off for Lexington, where Messrs. Hancock & Adams were, and acquaint them of the Movement, and that it was thought they were the objets." |
| | | | |
| − | He set out to warn Hancock and Adams, not to affirm the 2nd amendment rights against BigGovernment. Don't we look like fools if we just make things up? {{unsigned|Jds}} | + | He set out to warn Hancock and Adams, not to affirm the 2nd amendment rights against BigGovernment. Don't we look like fools if we just make things up? {{unsigned|Jds}} |
| | | | |
| | Is Paul Revere really the hill on which we want to tussle over political ideology? I reverted it back to the 2009 entry because it seems silly to sacrifice legitimate history in the name of politics. {{unsigned|Redsquareblack}} | | Is Paul Revere really the hill on which we want to tussle over political ideology? I reverted it back to the 2009 entry because it seems silly to sacrifice legitimate history in the name of politics. {{unsigned|Redsquareblack}} |
| Line 41: |
Line 39: |
| | ==Reversion== | | ==Reversion== |
| | Is there a reason this mateial was reverted: | | Is there a reason this mateial was reverted: |
| − | *''weapons, and that they would exercise their natural right to keep and bear arms to resist their [[Big Government]] bullying <ref>http://macsmind.com/wordpress/2011/06/03/sarah-palin-was-right-about-paul-reveres-ride/</ref><ref>http://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/peter-roff/2011/06/06/sarah-palin-was-right-about-paul-revere</ref><ref>http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/The-Vote/2011/0606/Sarah-Palin-says-she-s-right-about-Paul-Revere.-Is-that-wrong</ref>. {{reflist}} | + | *''weapons, and that they would exercise their natural right to keep and bear arms to resist their [[Big Government]] bullying <ref>http://macsmind.com/wordpress/2011/06/03/sarah-palin-was-right-about-paul-reveres-ride/</ref><ref>http://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/peter-roff/2011/06/06/sarah-palin-was-right-about-paul-revere</ref><ref>http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/The-Vote/2011/0606/Sarah-Palin-says-she-s-right-about-Paul-Revere.-Is-that-wrong</ref>. <references/> |
| | | | |
| | [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 22:41, 7 June 2011 (EDT) | | [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 22:41, 7 June 2011 (EDT) |