Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
19 bytes added ,  03:41, June 8, 2011
m
switching up template - which in safari is causing the outside borders of the page (the left side navigation as well as the top navigation) to show as small
Line 1: Line 1: −
<center>'''''Reminder: Please sign all comments. Thank you'''''</center>
+
<div style="text-align:center">'''''Reminder: Please sign all comments. Thank you'''''</div>
 
  −
 
      
Actually, Revere was captured early on.  Other riders sent out the warning, but Revere had a name that was easy to rhyme. [[User:Czolgolz|Czolgolz]] 14:21, 17 April 2007 (EDT)
 
Actually, Revere was captured early on.  Other riders sent out the warning, but Revere had a name that was easy to rhyme. [[User:Czolgolz|Czolgolz]] 14:21, 17 April 2007 (EDT)
Line 18: Line 16:  
"On Tuesday evening, the 18th, it was observed, that a number of Soldiers were marching towards the bottom of the Common. About 10 o'Clock, Dr. Warren Sent in great haste for me, and beged that I would imediately Set off for Lexington, where Messrs. Hancock & Adams were, and acquaint them of the Movement, and that it was thought they were the objets."
 
"On Tuesday evening, the 18th, it was observed, that a number of Soldiers were marching towards the bottom of the Common. About 10 o'Clock, Dr. Warren Sent in great haste for me, and beged that I would imediately Set off for Lexington, where Messrs. Hancock & Adams were, and acquaint them of the Movement, and that it was thought they were the objets."
   −
He set out to warn Hancock and Adams, not to affirm the 2nd amendment rights against BigGovernment.  Don't we look like fools if we  just make things up? {{unsigned|Jds}}  
+
He set out to warn Hancock and Adams, not to affirm the 2nd amendment rights against BigGovernment.  Don't we look like fools if we  just make things up? {{unsigned|Jds}}
    
Is Paul Revere really the hill on which we want to tussle over political ideology? I reverted it back to the 2009 entry because it seems silly to sacrifice legitimate history in the name of politics. {{unsigned|Redsquareblack}}
 
Is Paul Revere really the hill on which we want to tussle over political ideology? I reverted it back to the 2009 entry because it seems silly to sacrifice legitimate history in the name of politics. {{unsigned|Redsquareblack}}
Line 41: Line 39:  
==Reversion==
 
==Reversion==
 
Is there a reason this mateial was reverted:
 
Is there a reason this mateial was reverted:
*''weapons, and that they would exercise their natural right to keep and bear arms to resist their [[Big Government]] bullying <ref>http://macsmind.com/wordpress/2011/06/03/sarah-palin-was-right-about-paul-reveres-ride/</ref><ref>http://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/peter-roff/2011/06/06/sarah-palin-was-right-about-paul-revere</ref><ref>http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/The-Vote/2011/0606/Sarah-Palin-says-she-s-right-about-Paul-Revere.-Is-that-wrong</ref>. {{reflist}}
+
*''weapons, and that they would exercise their natural right to keep and bear arms to resist their [[Big Government]] bullying <ref>http://macsmind.com/wordpress/2011/06/03/sarah-palin-was-right-about-paul-reveres-ride/</ref><ref>http://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/peter-roff/2011/06/06/sarah-palin-was-right-about-paul-revere</ref><ref>http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/The-Vote/2011/0606/Sarah-Palin-says-she-s-right-about-Paul-Revere.-Is-that-wrong</ref>. <references/>
    
[[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 22:41, 7 June 2011 (EDT)
 
[[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 22:41, 7 June 2011 (EDT)
SkipCaptcha, nsSupply_SidersR, nsSupply_Siders_
8,436

edits

Navigation menu