Changes

Opponents have pointed to linguistic anachronisms in the text, such as it being written entirely in a Sixteenth-century King James style and its use of words such as French word "adieu". However Apologists argue to have found to have numerous Semetic linguistic and literary traits within it which make it appear authenitic, such as the inclusion of Chaismus<ref>[http://en.fairmormon.org/Book_of_Mormon/Evidences/Hebraisms/Chiasmus Chiasmus]</ref> and numerous other Hebrew traits within the text<ref>[http://en.fairmormon.org/Book_of_Mormon/Evidences/Hebraisms]</ref>

Opponents have pointed to linguistic anachronisms in the text, such as it being written entirely in a Sixteenth-century King James style and its use of words such as French word "adieu". However Apologists argue to have found to have numerous Semetic linguistic and literary traits within it which make it appear authenitic, such as the inclusion of Chaismus<ref>[http://en.fairmormon.org/Book_of_Mormon/Evidences/Hebraisms/Chiasmus Chiasmus]</ref> and numerous other Hebrew traits within the text<ref>[http://en.fairmormon.org/Book_of_Mormon/Evidences/Hebraisms]</ref>

Mormons do ultimately confess that the main evidence and support for the Book of Mormon does not center upon history or language but upon faith that it is a divinely inspired document.  

Mormons do ultimately confess that the main evidence and support for the Book of Mormon does not center upon history or language but upon faith that it is a divinely inspired document.  

Mormon apologist Jeff Lindsay has compiled his own list Book of Mormon evidences.<ref>[http://www.jefflindsay.com/BMEvidences.shtml]</ref>

Mormon apologist Jeff Lindsay has compiled his own list Book of Mormon evidences.<ref>[http://www.jefflindsay.com/BMEvidences.shtml]</ref>