Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
568
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 9:
Line 9: + +
no edit summary
==Title==
==Title==
I feel that ''Biblical codes'' (or ''Codes in the Bible'') would sound and scan better, though I may be mistaken. These titles would imply, however, that the Bible was discussing codes, so perhaps ''Biblical encoding'' would be more precise. [[User:GuidoF|Guy]]<sup>[[User_talk:GuidoF|message me]]</sup> 07:49, 10 June 2011 (EDT)
I feel that ''Biblical codes'' (or ''Codes in the Bible'') would sound and scan better, though I may be mistaken. These titles would imply, however, that the Bible was discussing codes, so perhaps ''Biblical encoding'' would be more precise. [[User:GuidoF|Guy]]<sup>[[User_talk:GuidoF|message me]]</sup> 07:49, 10 June 2011 (EDT)
:I thinking there certainly is a sense in which that is a good idea. But, my singular, and quite pressing, hunch is that any title but "Bible Codes" would be too complicated, even if more self-explanatory in a sense. Are you familiar with "Mind maps"? Specifically, with the most open-and-simple versions of them? I mean, any title which is so self-explanatory as never to be misleading for any frame of semantic reference would be far longer than the article itself. :) LOL! Feel free to change the title. But, if you do so, how does a wiki take care of all references in other articles to [[[Bible Codes]]? I do recall a 're-routing' thingy, but I don't know what it is, nor if it's automatic or if it has to be created manually. [[User:PatternOfPersona|PatternOfPersona]] 18:11, 10 June 2011 (EDT)