Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, Moderators, move, protect, rollback, Administrators
27,336
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 19:
Line 19: − :The real problem with facebook is that something like 80% of the users are complete idiots. Just take a look at facebookfails. On another note, I don't think that the opinions of those who work somewhere represent the site itself. Facebook is primarily composed of whatever someone decides to write about, whether they be leftist/conservative/neo-Nazi or whatever. That sentence should be removed.--[[User:LucRenardeux|LucRenardeux]] 14:17, 15 June 2011 (EDT)
Reverted edits by LucRenardeux (talk) to last revision by Jasonb242
This website seems to be vehemently opposed to facebook, claiming it is liberal. Is allowing people to have their relationship status with another of the same sex really enough to make the website "liberal"? Also the page mentions that the site leads to divorce. What does that have to do with liberalism? If the site really does lead to divorce it is only because people can see what their spouses are doing when they think no one is looking, something that has nothing to do with facebook's policies but rather infidelity in and of itself. This is probably the most bizzare article on conservapedia.
This website seems to be vehemently opposed to facebook, claiming it is liberal. Is allowing people to have their relationship status with another of the same sex really enough to make the website "liberal"? Also the page mentions that the site leads to divorce. What does that have to do with liberalism? If the site really does lead to divorce it is only because people can see what their spouses are doing when they think no one is looking, something that has nothing to do with facebook's policies but rather infidelity in and of itself. This is probably the most bizzare article on conservapedia.