Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
371 bytes added ,  03:03, June 16, 2011
Line 31: Line 31:  
::::::The structure of a forum can have inherent political biases.  That's already been seen on Wikipedia, for example.  Facebook is another example.  When something is inherently gossipy, self-centered and unproductive, it's going to be more [[liberal]] than [[conservative]] in result.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 21:59, 15 June 2011 (EDT)
 
::::::The structure of a forum can have inherent political biases.  That's already been seen on Wikipedia, for example.  Facebook is another example.  When something is inherently gossipy, self-centered and unproductive, it's going to be more [[liberal]] than [[conservative]] in result.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 21:59, 15 June 2011 (EDT)
 
::::::: Don't blame the whole for the faults of the individual. If people gossip, are self-centered or unproductive then it is their faults, not the fault of the tool that can be used to do so. All forms of communication can be used to exhibit those traits.
 
::::::: Don't blame the whole for the faults of the individual. If people gossip, are self-centered or unproductive then it is their faults, not the fault of the tool that can be used to do so. All forms of communication can be used to exhibit those traits.
 +
::::::::A.Sch, ignoring the fact that you, yourself, run a website with an inherent political bias, your entire argument is based on a logical fallacy. "Begging the question" to be more specific. You are arguing on the assumption that A) Facebook is unproductive; and B) that unproductiveness leads to liberalism. --[[User:Jasonb242|Jasonb242]] 23:03, 15 June 2011 (EDT)
37

edits

Navigation menu