Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
4 bytes added ,  07:44, June 16, 2011
Line 11: Line 11:  
Finally, in 1859, Charles Darwin published his famous theory about how the species may have been produced without any aid from a Divine Creator. He titled his book ''On [[The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection]], or The Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life''. In 1871, well after his theory enjoyed widespread success, Darwin published his ideas on human evolution in a two-volume book titled ''[[The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex]].'' On his deathbed, Darwin admitted that the idea of a human eye evolving out of nothing was absurd, and he repented and apparently died as a Christian.
 
Finally, in 1859, Charles Darwin published his famous theory about how the species may have been produced without any aid from a Divine Creator. He titled his book ''On [[The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection]], or The Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life''. In 1871, well after his theory enjoyed widespread success, Darwin published his ideas on human evolution in a two-volume book titled ''[[The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex]].'' On his deathbed, Darwin admitted that the idea of a human eye evolving out of nothing was absurd, and he repented and apparently died as a Christian.
   −
== Darwin's obsessive preoccupation with public persona and reactions to criticism ==
+
== Darwin's obsessive preoccupation with his public persona and reactions to criticism ==
    
In 2002, Richard Milner wrote in a Scientific American in a article entitled [http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=000B62D6-7E63-1D7E-90FB809EC5880000# "Putting Darwin in his Place"], that Darwin ''"clipped, catalogued and indexed hundreds of offprints, about 350 reviews and 1,600 articles, as well as satires, parodies and Punch caricatures, with which he filled hefty scrapbooks..."''  And it appears as if the criticism of his work may have troubled Darwin.  Milner in the aforementioned article, wrote that after [[Charles Lyell]] published a very weak endorsement of Darwin's Antiquity of Man, ''"Darwin's disappointment brought on 10 days of vomiting, faintness and stomach distress".  Also when anatomist St. George Mivart made a strong attack on The Descent of Man,  Milner wrote it "triggered two months of "giddiness" and inability to work..." ''
 
In 2002, Richard Milner wrote in a Scientific American in a article entitled [http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=000B62D6-7E63-1D7E-90FB809EC5880000# "Putting Darwin in his Place"], that Darwin ''"clipped, catalogued and indexed hundreds of offprints, about 350 reviews and 1,600 articles, as well as satires, parodies and Punch caricatures, with which he filled hefty scrapbooks..."''  And it appears as if the criticism of his work may have troubled Darwin.  Milner in the aforementioned article, wrote that after [[Charles Lyell]] published a very weak endorsement of Darwin's Antiquity of Man, ''"Darwin's disappointment brought on 10 days of vomiting, faintness and stomach distress".  Also when anatomist St. George Mivart made a strong attack on The Descent of Man,  Milner wrote it "triggered two months of "giddiness" and inability to work..." ''
Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
350,910

edits

Navigation menu