Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
288 bytes added ,  17:52, June 17, 2011
Line 54: Line 54:  
::::: Heh, conservative beat me to it. v  If those stats are true, then TV is more of a Liberal tool than Facebook for pulling away from productivity than Facebook. And you have yet to supply your statements with facts so I question if you sir are just trying to stir up a baseless issue. Is that a red herring or a strawman? [[User:MHarris|MHarris]]
 
::::: Heh, conservative beat me to it. v  If those stats are true, then TV is more of a Liberal tool than Facebook for pulling away from productivity than Facebook. And you have yet to supply your statements with facts so I question if you sir are just trying to stir up a baseless issue. Is that a red herring or a strawman? [[User:MHarris|MHarris]]
 
:::::: And you undo my attempt to make the page more like an encyclopedia and STILL don't back up anything you say with fact! This is becoming the Conservative version of Wikipedia and that isn't a good thing. We are supposed to be better than this. [[User:MHarris|MHarris]]
 
:::::: And you undo my attempt to make the page more like an encyclopedia and STILL don't back up anything you say with fact! This is becoming the Conservative version of Wikipedia and that isn't a good thing. We are supposed to be better than this. [[User:MHarris|MHarris]]
:::::::"''No one is doubting Facebook's "right" to waste people's time and disrupt marriages, but surely there is full [[free speech]] to criticize it''"....Again. Begging the question. Whether or not Facebook is a waste of time is an opinion matter. What i want to know is why you use these qualities as evidence of some kind of liberal agenda. And the thing about disrupting marriages, like i said before, the only effect facebook can have is ''exposing'' infidelity. The problem lies with cheating itself, and not with facebook. --[[User:Jasonb242|Jasonb242]] 13:40, 17 June 2011 (EDT)
+
:::::::"''No one is doubting Facebook's "right" to waste people's time and disrupt marriages, but surely there is full [[free speech]] to criticize it''"....Again. Begging the question. Whether or not Facebook is a waste of time is an opinion matter. What i want to know is why you use these qualities as evidence of some kind of liberal agenda. And the thing about disrupting marriages, like i said before, the only effect facebook can have is ''exposing'' infidelity. The problem lies with cheating itself, and not with facebook. And seriously, even if facebook was out to break up every marriage, what does that have to do with liberalism? This sub-topic is about facebook's supposed liberal agenda. You have posted some (unfounded) reasons for disliking the site, but you have not shown any correlation to liberalism--[[User:Jasonb242|Jasonb242]] 13:40, 17 June 2011 (EDT)
    
== Facebook's harmful effects  ==
 
== Facebook's harmful effects  ==
37

edits

Navigation menu