5
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 7:
Line 7: + + +
Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)
Revision as of 23:04, April 5, 2007
, 23:04, April 5, 2007no edit summary
== Post comments here ==
== Post comments here ==
==Wikipedia vs. Conservapedia==
BTW, I'm a far right wing conservative writing this. Although some of your points are correct, and Wikipedia still has a few problems with POV, it's little compared to Conservapedia's blatant bias--and preference to "the majority of American's opintions" over all other data. What the opinion of American's is isn't really the main concern of a subject--if it was, I guess here would be a good place to go, if they want to find more solid information--even about such silly things as dogs--they might as well check out wikipedia, or citizendium. Even some of the controversial subjects, where Wikipedia is very anti conservative (sometimes to the point of dishonest) there articles are more informative then yours!--[[User:Jacklovedlucy|Jacklovedlucy]] 19:04, 5 April 2007 (EDT)
== Porn again ==
== Porn again ==